What's Challenging Your Mining Project Team?
- Incorrect drawing/document revisions triggering rework, safety incidents, and cost growth
- No formal revision control and transmittals that are designed to mitigate this risk
- Compliance visibility isn’t up to client information standards (e.g., numbering, metadata validation, handover packages), causing admin overhead
- Struggling to keep document deliverables on schedule and a lack of integration-to-planning tools
- Limited ability for field and remote teams to work reliably in low‑bandwidth or offline locations while staying aligned to the controlled source of truth
The Best Software Solutions for Metals, Mining, and Minerals Projects
For large, engineered assets typical of MMM, Ascertra provides purpose‑built software to control engineering information, align delivery teams, and keep performance on track.
- Clarify scope boundaries across multi‑contract mine builds by formalizing interface points, requirements, and deliverables from FEED through construction.
- Track and close interface actions with dashboards, trends, and owner/EPC oversight so issues are surfaced and resolved before they affect schedule.
- Keep interfaces aligned to the right documents via the Coreworx EDMS Connector; linking interface records to controlled EDMS revisions and alerting stakeholders when a new revision is issued.
- Stop rework from wrong revisions with engineering‑grade revision control, formal transmittals, and full audit trails.
- Keep field teams productive at remote sites with offline/low‑bandwidth access and sync back to the official record when connectivity is available.
- Plan document deliverables using milestone‑based rules of credit, link to P6/Safran/MS Project, and report plan versus actual to expedite drawing/vendor data through to handover.
- Control budgets and forecast performance with earned‑value‑driven project controls tailored for large industrial projects; centralizing cost, progress, and performance KPIs
- Accelerate billing and period close for contractor‑heavy work by structuring labour, equipment, materials (LEMs)/time writing, applying complex rate rules, and enforcing multi‑stage validations.
- Connect controls to your ecosystem by integrating with ERP and preferred scheduling tools (e.g., Primavera).
- Plan rotations for remote operations and maintain a single source of truth for personnel, competencies, and certifications so only qualified crews are mobilized to site.
- Gain portfolio‑level visibility of availability and skills, with integrations to enterprise HR/time/training systems to reduce manual effort and coordination risk.
Stop incorrect revisions from reaching the pit, plant, or construction site with formal revision control, transmittals, and a complete audit trail to defend claims.
Apply configurable numbering schemes, metadata validation rules, and client‑specific handover exports to meet contract and acceptance criteria.
Allocate documents to packages, set milestone chains and rules of credit, and monitor plan vs. actual with charts and re‑forecasting—integrated with tools like Primavera P6/Safran/MS Project.
Keep crews productive with offline/low‑bandwidth access (e.g., in a mine) while maintaining governance and synchronizing back to the official record.
Use web‑based viewing/markup (incl. AutoCAD support) and automated PDF rendition/comment sheets to streamline reviews and produce client‑ready or offline handover packages.
.png?width=1200&length=1200&name=edf-renewables-logo-vector-300x120%20(1).png){kind=logo}
$12B FPSO program coordinates FEED contractors and supports local‑content compliance with structured interface management.
Global EPC standardizes engineering document control at enterprise scale while reducing duplicate entry for a rollout targeting 5,000+ users.
Read more
EPC accelerates time‑to‑invoice by centralizing LEMs data and automating complex rate calculations across thousands of daily labor and equipment entries.
Offshore drilling operator scales scheduling for 2,000+ rotational employees by centralizing crew data and enforcing “single‑system” reporting.
